Quinn v. Shortall
This text of 12 N.W. 153 (Quinn v. Shortall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The demurrer is clearly frivolous. The first count of the complaint states fully a cause of action for false imprisonment, and the second a cause of action for assault and battery. The matters in the first count, of injury to plaintiff’s credit and business, are [107]*107beyond question set forth as elements of damage consequent on the wrong complained of, to wit, the false imprisonment, and not as distinct causes of action, as assumed by the demurrer.
Order affirmed.
Vanderburgh, J., did not sit in this ease.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 N.W. 153, 29 Minn. 106, 1882 Minn. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinn-v-shortall-minn-1882.