Quinn v. Nadler Bros.

453 N.E.2d 521, 59 N.Y.2d 914, 466 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3237
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 16, 1983·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs. The City of Amsterdam has no special duty to its fire fighters for its failure to enforce city ordinances designed to protect the general public from health, safety and fire hazards (see O’Connor v City of New York, 58 NY2d 184; Sanchez v Village of Liberty, 42 NY2d 878; Motyka v City of Amsterdam, 15 NY2d 134).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quinn v. Nadler Bros., 453 N.E.2d 521, 59 N.Y.2d 914, 466 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3237 (N.Y. 1983).

453 N.E.2d 521 (Quinn v. Nadler Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pelaez v. Seide
810 N.E.2d 393 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
Joslyn v. Village of Sylvan Beach
256 A.D.2d 1166 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Dore v. Schultz
582 F. Supp. 154 (S.D. New York, 1984)
Chung v. State
122 Misc. 2d 676 (New York State Court of Claims, 1984)