Quinn v. Kelly
This text of 92 A.D.3d 589 (Quinn v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Medical Board ruled out stress as the cause of petitioner’s cardiomyopathy, and concluded that there was no known association between exposure to toxins at the World Trade Center disaster recovery and clean up sites and the development of viral myocarditis. The Board of Trustees were entitled to rely on this finding to overcome the presumption of General Municipal Law § 207-k (see Matter of Lo Pinto v Ward, 124 AD2d 497 [1986]; Matter of Goldman v McGuire, 101 AD2d 768, 770 [1984], affd 64 NY2d 1041 [1985]). Petitioner acknowledges that cardiomyopathy is not a qualifying condition under Administrative Code § 13-252.1 (1) (a) and Retirement and Social Security Law § 2 (36) (c), related to illness incurred in connection with World Trade Center recovery and clean up operations.
We have reviewed petitioner’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Sweeny, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 A.D.3d 589, 938 N.Y.2d 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinn-v-kelly-nyappdiv-2012.