Quinn v. Frederick Loeser & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Quinn v. Frederick Loeser & Co.

233 A.D. 684

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 233 A.D. 684 (Quinn v. Frederick Loeser & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quinn v. Frederick Loeser & Co., 233 A.D. 684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, directing the [685]*685examination of defendant upon all six items covered by the notice of motion herein. Plaintiff is entitled to examine defendant upon the items mentioned in the order and to inspect documents as requested. The directions in the order do not give plaintiff that to which she is entitled. Examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, directing the [685]*685examination of defendant upon all six items covered by the notice of motion herein. Plaintiff is entitled to examine defendant upon the items mentioned in the order and to inspect documents as requested. The directions in the order do not give plaintiff that to which she is entitled. Examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D. 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinn-v-frederick-loeser-co-nyappdiv-1931.