Quinn v. Eckels
209 A.D. 890
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 209 A.D. 890 (Quinn v. Eckels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Quinn v. Eckels, 209 A.D. 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox and Young, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents and votes to reverse, and for a new trial, upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence upon the question of defendant’s negligence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Parslow v. United States
87 F. Supp. 259 (N.D. New York, 1949)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
209 A.D. 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinn-v-eckels-nyappdiv-1924.