Quinn-Jacobs v. Moquin
Opinion
| Quinn-Jacobs v Moquin |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 00571 |
| Decided on January 28, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on January 28, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
951 CA 21-00260
v
ROSS MOQUIN, M.D., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND CROUSE HOSPITAL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
EDELMAN & EDELMAN, P.C., NEW YORK CITY (JOHN CHERUNDOLO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
GALE GALE & HUNT, LLC, SYRACUSE (ANDREW R. BORRELLI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Gerard J. Neri, J.), entered February 3, 2021. The order denied the motion of plaintiffs for leave to renew that part of their motion seeking leave to amend the bill of particulars.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Quinn-Jacobs v Moquin ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Jan. 28, 2022] [4th Dept 2022]).
Entered: January 28, 2022
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2022 NY Slip Op 00571 (Quinn-Jacobs v. Moquin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.