Quinlan v. Stratton

7 N.Y.S. 786, 28 N.Y. St. Rep. 385, 55 Hun 606, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1302
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 10, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 7 N.Y.S. 786 (Quinlan v. Stratton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quinlan v. Stratton, 7 N.Y.S. 786, 28 N.Y. St. Rep. 385, 55 Hun 606, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1302 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Opinion

Dykman, J.

This is an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage, and upon the trial the plaintiff had judgment. The defendants appealed from the judgment, and made and served a proposed case. Before the case was settled, the defendants moved, upon affidavits which are now printed among the papers submitted to us, for a new trial, without disclosing any grounds for the motion. The motion was denied, and the defendants have, appealed from the order of denial. The affidavits make no case for a new trial, and the practice was irregular. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 N.Y.S. 786, 28 N.Y. St. Rep. 385, 55 Hun 606, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinlan-v-stratton-nysupct-1889.