Home/California Court of Appeal/Quinlan v. Packard-Bell Co.

Quinlan v. Packard-Bell Co.

236 P.2d 206, 106 Cal. App. 2d 829, 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1840
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 15, 1951
DocketCiv. No. 18412
StatusPublished

This text of 236 P.2d 206 (Quinlan v. Packard-Bell Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quinlan v. Packard-Bell Co., 236 P.2d 206, 106 Cal. App. 2d 829, 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1840 (Cal. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

McCOMB, J.

It has been stipulated that the decision in Marshall v. Packard-Bell, No. 18411 (ante, p. 770 [236 P.2d 201]), shall be controlling in the above-entitled case. Since we have this day filed a decision affirming the judgment in Marshall v. Packard-Bell, it is ordered that the judgment in the instant ease be affirmed.

Moore, P. J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied November 1,1951, and appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied December 13, 1951.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall v. Packard-Bell Co.
236 P.2d 201 (California Court of Appeal, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 P.2d 206, 106 Cal. App. 2d 829, 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinlan-v-packard-bell-co-calctapp-1951.