Quinlan v. Mott
375 So. 2d 589, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15475
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 6, 1979·No. Nos. 79-714/T 4-474; 79-715/T 4-474A·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order dismissing a complaint without leave to amend. It is apparent the deficiencies in the complaint can probably be cured by amendment without any essential departure from the facts already alleged. Thus, although the trial court correctly granted the appellee’s motion to dismiss, the order should have been with leave to amend. Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.190. Petterson v. Concrete Construction, Inc., 202 So.2d 191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Quinlan v. Mott, 375 So. 2d 589, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15475 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).
375 So. 2d 589 (Quinlan v. Mott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
GM Drug Co. v. Taylor
412 So. 2d 943 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Davis v. Sun First Nat. Bank of Orlando
408 So. 2d 608 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)