Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Quinlan v. Mott

Quinlan v. Mott

375 So. 2d 589, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15475
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 6, 1979
DocketNos. 79-714/T 4-474; 79-715/T 4-474A
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 375 So. 2d 589 (Quinlan v. Mott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quinlan v. Mott, 375 So. 2d 589, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15475 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a complaint without leave to amend. It is apparent the deficiencies in the complaint can probably be cured by amendment without any essential departure from the facts already alleged. Thus, although the trial court correctly granted the appellee’s motion to dismiss, the order should have been with leave to amend. Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.190. Petterson v. Concrete Construction, Inc., 202 So.2d 191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY, JAMES C., and BERANEK, JOHN R., Associate Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GM Drug Co. v. Taylor
412 So. 2d 943 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Davis v. Sun First Nat. Bank of Orlando
408 So. 2d 608 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
375 So. 2d 589, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinlan-v-mott-fladistctapp-1979.