Quinlan v. Ellis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Quinlan v. Ellis

24 A.D.2d 938, 265 N.Y.S.2d 577, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2891

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 938 (Quinlan v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quinlan v. Ellis, 24 A.D.2d 938, 265 N.Y.S.2d 577, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiffs-respondents Fitzpatrick and Feeley, severing their actions and ordering a new trial as to said plaintiffs, with $50 costs to defendants-appellants, unless plaintiff Fitzpatrick stipulates to accept $3,000 and plaintiff Feeley stipulates to accept $500, in which event the judgment is modified, and as so modified, affirmed as to said plaintiffs, with $50 costs to defendants against said plaintiffs-respondents; and otherwise insofar as the judgment is in favor of plaintiff Quinlan, the judgment is affirmed, with $50 costs to plaintiff Quinlan against defendants. In our opinion, the damages awarded to plaintiffs, Fitzpatrick and Feeley, are excessive under the circumstances of this ease. Settle order on notice. Concur-—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiffs-respondents Fitzpatrick and Feeley, severing their actions and ordering a new trial as to said plaintiffs, with $50 costs to defendants-appellants, unless plaintiff Fitzpatrick stipulates to accept $3,000 and plaintiff Feeley stipulates to accept $500, in which event the judgment is modified, and as so modified, affirmed as to said plaintiffs, with $50 costs to defendants against said plaintiffs-respondents; and otherwise insofar as the judgment is in favor of plaintiff Quinlan, the judgment is affirmed, with $50 costs to plaintiff Quinlan against defendants. In our opinion, the damages awarded to plaintiffs, Fitzpatrick and Feeley, are excessive under the circumstances of this ease. Settle order on notice. Concur-—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 938, 265 N.Y.S.2d 577, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinlan-v-ellis-nyappdiv-1965.