Quincy Reshawn Gilstrap v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 20, 2022
Docket05-22-01031-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Quincy Reshawn Gilstrap v. the State of Texas (Quincy Reshawn Gilstrap v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quincy Reshawn Gilstrap v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Order entered December 20, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-01031-CR

QUINCY RESHAWN GILSTRAP, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F21-75410

ORDER

The clerk’s record, reporter’s record, and docketing statement are overdue.

On November 10, 2022, we notified the district clerk by postcard that the

clerk’s record was overdue, and we directed the district clerk to file the clerk’s

record within 30 days. Although more than 30 days have passed, the clerk’s record

has not been filed. Accordingly, we ORDER the district clerk to file the clerk’s

record within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. On November 10, 2022, we notified Kelly Simmons, court reporter, 292nd

Judicial District Court, by postcard that the reporter’s record was overdue, and we

directed Kelly Simmons to file within 30 days (1) the reporter’s record, (2) written

verification that no hearings were recorded, or (3) written verification that

appellant has not requested the reporter’s record. Although more than 30 days

have passed, the reporter’s record or court reporter’s verification have not been

filed. Accordingly, we ORDER Kelly Simmons, court reporter, 292nd Judicial

District Court, to file within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order (1) the

reporter’s record, (2) written verification that no hearings were recorded, or (3)

written verification that appellant has not requested the reporter’s record.

On October 3, 2022, we notified counsel for appellant by postcard that the

docketing statement was overdue, and we directed counsel to file a proper

docketing statement within 10 days. As of the date of this order, the docketing

statement has not been filed. Accordingly we ORDER counsel for appellant to

file a proper docketing statement with this Court within TEN DAYS of the date of

this order.

We DIRECT the clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable

Brandon Birmingham, Presiding Judge, 292nd Judicial District Court; Felicia Pitre,

Dallas County District Clerk; Kelly Simmons, court reporter, 292nd Judicial

District Court; and to counsel for all parties. /s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Quincy Reshawn Gilstrap v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quincy-reshawn-gilstrap-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.