Quincy Plaza, L.C. v. Merrikh

Fourth Circuit

Quincy Plaza, L.C. v. Merrikh

463 F. App'x 185

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 2, 2012

DocketNo. 11-1610

StatusPublished

This text of 463 F. App'x 185 (Quincy Plaza, L.C. v. Merrikh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quincy Plaza, L.C. v. Merrikh, 463 F. App'x 185 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Haleh Merrikh appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to extend time to file an appellate brief and dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s [186]*186order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Quincy Plaza, L.C. v. Merrikh (In re Merrikh), Nos. 1:11-cv-00164-CMH-IDD; 09-18890-SSM; 10-01024-SSM (E.D. Va. filed May 3, 2011; entered May 4, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Haleh Merrikh appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to extend time to file an appellate brief and dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s [186]*186order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Quincy Plaza, L.C. v. Merrikh (In re Merrikh), Nos. 1:11-cv-00164-CMH-IDD; 09-18890-SSM; 10-01024-SSM (E.D. Va. filed May 3, 2011; entered May 4, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

463 F. App'x 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quincy-plaza-lc-v-merrikh-ca4-2012.