Quincy Plaza, L.C. v. Merrikh

463 F. App'x 185
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 2, 2012·No. No. 11-1610·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Haleh Merrikh appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to extend time to file an appellate brief and dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s [186]*186order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Quincy Plaza, L.C. v. Merrikh (In re Merrikh), Nos. 1:11-cv-00164-CMH-IDD; 09-18890-SSM; 10-01024-SSM (E.D. Va. filed May 3, 2011; entered May 4, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quincy Plaza, L.C. v. Merrikh, 463 F. App'x 185 (4th Cir. 2012).

463 F. App'x 185 (Quincy Plaza, L.C. v. Merrikh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.