Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City Railroad v. Shohoney
223 U.S. 705, 32 S. Ct. 517, 56 L. Ed. 621, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1792
Opinion
Dismissed for .the want of jurisdiction. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 116, 117; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Giles v. Teasley, 193 U. S. 146; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City Railroad v. Shohoney, 223 U.S. 705, 32 S. Ct. 517, 56 L. Ed. 621, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1792 (1911).
223 U.S. 705 (Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City Railroad v. Shohoney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Giles v. Teasley, Board of Registrars
193 U.S. 146 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Leathe v. Thomas
207 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2)
212 U.S. 112 (Supreme Court, 1909)