Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City Railroad v. Shohoney
223 U.S. 705, 32 S. Ct. 517, 56 L. Ed. 621, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1792
This text of 223 U.S. 705 (Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City Railroad v. Shohoney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City Railroad v. Shohoney, 223 U.S. 705, 32 S. Ct. 517, 56 L. Ed. 621, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1792 (1911).
Opinion
Dismissed for .the want of jurisdiction. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 116, 117; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Giles v. Teasley, 193 U. S. 146; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Giles v. Teasley, Board of Registrars
193 U.S. 146 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Leathe v. Thomas
207 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2)
212 U.S. 112 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
223 U.S. 705, 32 S. Ct. 517, 56 L. Ed. 621, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quincy-omaha-kansas-city-railroad-v-shohoney-scotus-1911.