Quincy Dorsett v. State of Texas, Harris County
Opinion
Opinion issued December 17, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
In the motion, the parties stated that they had “reached an agreement to compromise and settle their differences” in the underlying litigation. The parties requested that the Court “grant th[e] joint motion,” “dismiss the entire appeal, set aside the trial court’s judgment” without regard to the merits, and “remand this case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B) (allowing appellate court to dismiss appeal upon agreement of parties to “set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the [parties’] agreement”).
The motion is signed by counsel for appellee, the State of Texas, and appellant. No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), (c).
Accordingly, we grant the parties’ motion, dismiss the appeal, and set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(e). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Guerra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Quincy Dorsett v. State of Texas, Harris County (Quincy Dorsett v. State of Texas, Harris County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.