Quincy Blakely v. State
This text of Quincy Blakely v. State (Quincy Blakely v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 05-18-00064-CR FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 1/30/2018 4:58 PM LISA MATZ CLERK
CASE NO. 05-18-00064-CR IN THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS 1/30/2018 4:58:31 PM __________________________________________________________________ LISA MATZ Clerk QUINCY BLAKELY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. __________________________________________________________________
APPELLANT’S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S JURISDICTIONAL LETTER BRIEF ________________________________________________________________
Quincy Blakely 2701 Little Elm Parkway Ste. 100-551 Little Elm, Texas
TO THE HONORABLE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS:
NOW COMES Quincy Blakely, Appellant herein, hereby moves this Court to extend
briefing schedule in this proceeding. In support of this motion, Appellant would show as follows:
1. This Court advised the parties on January 23, 2018 to file a jurisdictional letter brief, and
Appellant’s deadline for filing said jurisdictional letter brief in this matter is January 31,
2018 and Appellee’s deadline is February 9, 2018. 2. However, Appellant is seeking counsel in the preparation of the jurisdictional letter
matters and hereby request an extension to properly respond.
3. In light of seeking counsel, and due to the short notice provided for preparing and filing
this jurisdictional brief, Appellant has not yet had an adequate opportunity to properly
prepare the brief to be considered by this Court, and thus, seeks an extension of time to
be able to prepare a cogent and succinct brief to aid this Court in its analysis of the
jurisdictional issues presented, which relate to this Court’s jurisdiction to entertain an
appeal after a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter and Personal Jurisdiction
which was denied.
4. The State of Texas would not suffer any undue hardship or other prejudice as a result of an extension in the present case. This request is sought not for delay, but so that justice may be done.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully moves this Court to
grant the requested Appellant’s First Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s
Jurisdictional Letter Brief and reschedule this matter so as to allow Appellant to properly
present his brief to This Court, and to grant any and all relief to which Appellant may be
entitled in law or equity.
/s/ Quincy Blakely 2701 Little Elm Parkway #100-551 Little Elm, Texas blakelyrightsreserved@gmail.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of this Notice of Appeal was served upon the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office via https://efile.txcourts.gov.
/s/ Quincy Blakely
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Quincy Blakely v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quincy-blakely-v-state-texapp-2018.