Quince's Administrators v. Administrator of Ross
This text of 1 N.C. 155 (Quince's Administrators v. Administrator of Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By
Twenty years are considered sufficient to induce a presumption of the payment of a bond; where no interest has been paid, or demand made during that time; and how far, these circumstances have a tendency to weaken the presumption, is proper for the consideration of the jury, under the circumstances of each case.
With respect to the demand relied upon by the plaintiff, I do not think it is entitled to any weight, having been made of a person, wholly unconnected in the transaction; a fact which might have been ascertained by examining the records of the County Court. A writ sued out against the party really liable, though he should not be arrested upon it, if the transaction were bona fide, would go a great [156]*156length in defeating the presumption; so would an imperfect writ, if the proper party were arrested upon it: but this is demanding from one man the debt of another.
Verdict for the Defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.C. 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinces-administrators-v-administrator-of-ross-ncsuperct-1801.