Quince's Administrators v. Administrator of Ross
Opinion
By
Twenty years are considered sufficient to induce a presumption of the payment of a bond; where no interest has been paid, or demand made during that time; and how far, these circumstances have a tendency to weaken the presumption, is proper for the consideration of the jury, under the circumstances of each case.
With respect to the demand relied upon by the plaintiff, I do not think it is entitled to any weight, having been made of a person, wholly unconnected in the transaction; a fact which might have been ascertained by examining the records of the County Court. A writ sued out against the party really liable, though he should not be arrested upon it, if the transaction were bona fide, would go a great [156] length in defeating the presumption; so would an imperfect writ, if the proper party were arrested upon it: but this is demanding from one man the debt of another.
Verdict for the Defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 N.C. 155 (Quince's Administrators v. Administrator of Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.