Quince v. State

516 So. 2d 72, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2732, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11273, 1987 WL 2022
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 3, 1987
DocketNo. 86-1626
StatusPublished

This text of 516 So. 2d 72 (Quince v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quince v. State, 516 So. 2d 72, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2732, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11273, 1987 WL 2022 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

The defendant, Gregory Quince, was convicted of attempted arson of a dwelling. The trial court departed from the sentencing guidelines, enumerating some five reasons for departure, only one of which is valid under the law and factual evidence: that the defendant created a great risk of injury or death to multiple victims. See Scurry v. State, 489 So.2d 25 (Fla.1986). Pursuant to Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985),1 we reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing.

SENTENCE REVERSED; REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scurry v. State
489 So. 2d 25 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Albritton v. State
476 So. 2d 158 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Griffis v. State
509 So. 2d 1104 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
516 So. 2d 72, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2732, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11273, 1987 WL 2022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quince-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.