Quince v. State

475 So. 2d 916, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2283, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16139
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 1985·No. No. 85-578·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence in all respects, except that we find the trial court erred in assessing costs against appellant, who had been adjudicated indigent, without notice and an opportunity to be heard, contrary to Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike from the judgment that portion thereof which orders the payment of $15.00 pursuant to Section 960.20, Florida Statutes (1983) and court costs of $2.00.

HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quince v. State, 475 So. 2d 916, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2283, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16139 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

475 So. 2d 916 (Quince v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooks v. State
490 So. 2d 173 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)