Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Quince v. State

Quince v. State

475 So. 2d 916, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2283, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16139
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 24, 1985
DocketNo. 85-578
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 475 So. 2d 916 (Quince v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quince v. State, 475 So. 2d 916, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2283, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16139 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence in all respects, except that we find the trial court erred in assessing costs against appellant, who had been adjudicated indigent, without notice and an opportunity to be heard, contrary to Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike from the judgment that portion thereof which orders the payment of $15.00 pursuant to Section 960.20, Florida Statutes (1983) and court costs of $2.00.

HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brooks v. State
490 So. 2d 173 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
475 So. 2d 916, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2283, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quince-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.