Quince v. Callender

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Quince v. Callender

1 S.C. Eq. 160

Court of Chancery of South Carolina·Decided March 15, 1789·Published

Opinion

The master having represented to the court that the defendants in this cause had objected to the allowance of seven Per centí as not being the legal interest of North Carolina, where the marriage bond, in bill mentioned, was dated, the court were of opinion, that as the lands on which the settlement was made, Ian in this state, the interest °f iAis state should he allowed: And therefore ordered, that interest of seven per cent, being the legal interest thereof, should be allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The master having represented to the court that the defendants in this cause had objected to the allowance of seven Per centí as not being the legal interest of North Carolina, where the marriage bond, in bill mentioned, was dated, the court were of opinion, that as the lands on which the settlement was made, Ian in this state, the interest °f iAis state should he allowed: And therefore ordered, that interest of seven per cent, being the legal interest thereof, should be allowed.

Quince v. Callender, 1 S.C. Eq. 160 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1789).

Pincite

1 S.C. Eq. 160 (Quince v. Callender) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.