Quince v. Callender

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Quince v. Callender

1 S.C. Eq. 160

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedMarch 15, 1789

StatusPublished

This text of 1 S.C. Eq. 160 (Quince v. Callender) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quince v. Callender, 1 S.C. Eq. 160 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1789).

Pincite

Opinion

The master having represented to the court that the defendants in this cause had objected to the allowance of seven Per centí as not being the legal interest of North Carolina, where the marriage bond, in bill mentioned, was dated, the court were of opinion, that as the lands on which the settlement was made, Ian in this state, the interest °f iAis state should he allowed: And therefore ordered, that interest of seven per cent, being the legal interest thereof, should be allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The master having represented to the court that the defendants in this cause had objected to the allowance of seven Per centí as not being the legal interest of North Carolina, where the marriage bond, in bill mentioned, was dated, the court were of opinion, that as the lands on which the settlement was made, Ian in this state, the interest °f iAis state should he allowed: And therefore ordered, that interest of seven per cent, being the legal interest thereof, should be allowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 S.C. Eq. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quince-v-callender-ctchansc-1789.