Quin v. Quin

215 So. 2d 414, 1968 Miss. LEXIS 1353

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided November 11, 1968·No. No. 45062·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PATTERSON, Justice.

_ ...... . , Pursuant to the evidence, arguments ot counsel, and the established law of this state, this cause is affirmed on its merits.

The motion for attorney’s fees for services rendered by the attorney of the ap-pellee on this appeal is hereby sustained.

On the merits affirmed; motion for attorney’s' fees sustained.

GILLESPIE, P. J., and RODGERS, SMITH, and ROBERTSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PATTERSON, Justice.

_ ...... . , Pursuant to the evidence, arguments ot counsel, and the established law of this state, this cause is affirmed on its merits.

The motion for attorney’s fees for services rendered by the attorney of the ap-pellee on this appeal is hereby sustained.

On the merits affirmed; motion for attorney’s' fees sustained.

GILLESPIE, P. J., and RODGERS, SMITH, and ROBERTSON, JJ., concur.

Quin v. Quin, 215 So. 2d 414, 1968 Miss. LEXIS 1353 (Mich. 1968).

Pincite

215 So. 2d 414 (Quin v. Quin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.