Quin v. Herhold

Appellate Court of Illinois

Quin v. Herhold

100 Ill. App. 320, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 715

DecidedFebruary 21, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 100 Ill. App. 320 (Quin v. Herhold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quin v. Herhold, 100 Ill. App. 320, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 715 (Ill. Ct. App. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the court.

The offered testimony as to custom was properly excluded. There was no evidence of any custom or usage known, certain, uniform, reasonable and not contrary to law. Greenlealf on Evidence, Yol. 2, Secs. 248-250.

It does not appear that defendant objected to the notes being taken by the jury with the indorsements thereon.

The evidence is not such that we can say that there is a clear preponderance in favor of the contention of the defendant.

The judgment of the Superior Court must therefore be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI