Quimby v. Morrill

47 Me. 470
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1859·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Goodenow, J.,

announced the opinion of the Court.

From an examination of the evidence in the case, as reported, we are of opinion that the jury were justified in finding the consideration sufficient to render the defendant liable to pay the note. The motion to set aside the verdict must be overruled.

The burden of proof was clearly on the defendant. And though a witness cannot, generally, testify as to his intention in signing a written contract, and the defendant would not have been allowed to do so, against the objection of the plaintiff, it is not for the defendant in this case to complain.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quimby v. Morrill, 47 Me. 470 (Me. 1859).

47 Me. 470 (Quimby v. Morrill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hayes v. Hood
10 N.Y.S. 265 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)