Quimby v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

248 Mass. 364

• Court: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
• Decided: March 13, 1924
• Status: Published

Opinion

Rugg, C.J.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries alleged to have been received by the plaintiff, in 1919, while a passenger of the defendant, through the negligence of its servants. The defendant offered in evidence, as bearing on damages, a statement signed by a physician, deceased at the time of the trial, concerning an injury received by the plaintiff in a station of the defendant in 1910. The judge remarked, when objection to this evidence was made by the plaintiff, that the requirement of the statute was that the deceased must have made the statement of facts of his own knowledge before the beginning of the action and in good faith. In these circumstances the ruling that whatever the plaintiff stated to the decedent might be read imported a finding of the preliminary facts required by G. L. c. 233, § 65. McSweeney v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co. 228 Mass. 563, 564. Eldridge v. Barton, 232 Mass. 183.

The fact that the statement was made by the plaintiff, and reduced to writing and signed by the decedent ten or twelve years before the trial did not render it incompetent.

The statement was introduced in evidence only on the question of damages. The jury returned a general verdict for the defendant. Even if there had been error in the admission of evidence on the question of damages, it could not have harmed the plaintiff and the verdict would not be disturbed. Davis v. Elliott, 15 Gray, 90. Jordan v. Adams Gas Light Co. 231 Mass. 186. Franklin Park Lumber Co. v. Huie-Hodge Lumber Co. 246 Mass. 157.

Exceptions overruled.