Quilling v. McDonough
This text of 933 So. 2d 658 (Quilling v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gary C. QUILLING, Appellant,
v.
James R. McDONOUGH, State of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Gary C. Quilling, pro se, Appellant.
Louis A. Vargas, General Counsel, and Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of May 10, 2006, the Court has determined that the appeal should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).[1]
BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] If the appellant wishes to seek review of the order determining him to be indigent and directing the Department of Corrections to impose a lien on his inmate trust account, his remedy is to move to amend the petition for writ of certiorari filed in case number 1D06-1593. Statton v. Crosby, 912 So.2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
933 So. 2d 658, 2006 WL 1835811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quilling-v-mcdonough-fladistctapp-2006.