Quill v. Vacco

97 F.3d 708, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 26792
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Quill v. Vacco. Read the opinion of the Court — 80 F.3d 716
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided October 15, 1996·No. 95-7028·Published

Opinion

97 F.3d 708

Timothy E. QUILL, M.D.; Samuel C. Klagsbrun, M.D.; and
Howard A. Grossman, M.D., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Dennis C. VACCO, Attorney General of the State of New York;
George E. Pataki, Governor of the State of New
York; Robert M. Morgenthau, District
Attorney of New York County,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 60, Docket 95-7028.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Oct. 15, 1996.

JON O. NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

Upon consideration of the request by an active judge of this Court for a poll as to whether the Court should sua sponte rehear this appeal in banc, the poll was deferred pending the decision of the Supreme Court on the petition for a writ of certiorari; the Supreme Court having granted the petition for a writ of certiorari, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 36, 135 L.Ed.2d 1127 (1996), the request for a poll has been withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quill v. Vacco, 97 F.3d 708, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 26792 (2d Cir. 1996).

97 F.3d 708 (Quill v. Vacco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harbor Tug & Barge Co. v. Papai
518 U.S. 1055 (Supreme Court, 1996)