Quiles v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Quiles v. New York City Housing Authority

97 A.D.2d 505, 468 N.Y.S.2d 23, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20101

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 24, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 97 A.D.2d 505 (Quiles v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quiles v. New York City Housing Authority, 97 A.D.2d 505, 468 N.Y.S.2d 23, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20101 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., based, inter alia, on the theories of breach of warranty, strict products liability and negligence, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Goldberg, J.), dated January 12, 1983, as granted [506]*506that branch of the motion of defendant Staley Elevator Co., Inc., as sought summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint as against it, and (2) so much of a judgment of the same court, entered January 31,1983, as dismissed their complaint against said defendant. Appeal from the order dated January 12,1983 dismissed. (See Matter ofAho, 39 NY2d 241, 248.) Judgment entered January 31, 1983 affirmed, insofar as appealed from. Respondent is awarded one bill of costs. We note that the respondent had no control over, or connection with, the allegedly defective elevator for 16 years prior to the occurrence. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., based, inter alia, on the theories of breach of warranty, strict products liability and negligence, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Goldberg, J.), dated January 12, 1983, as granted [506]*506that branch of the motion of defendant Staley Elevator Co., Inc., as sought summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint as against it, and (2) so much of a judgment of the same court, entered January 31,1983, as dismissed their complaint against said defendant. Appeal from the order dated January 12,1983 dismissed. (See Matter ofAho, 39 NY2d 241, 248.) Judgment entered January 31, 1983 affirmed, insofar as appealed from. Respondent is awarded one bill of costs. We note that the respondent had no control over, or connection with, the allegedly defective elevator for 16 years prior to the occurrence. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A.D.2d 505, 468 N.Y.S.2d 23, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quiles-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack