Quijano v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Quijano v. New York City Transit Authority

12 A.D.2d 468, 208 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7048

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 468 (Quijano v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quijano v. New York City Transit Authority, 12 A.D.2d 468, 208 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7048 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered on August 14, 1958, which granted the motion of the infant plaintiff for leave pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law to serve a late notice of claim unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion denied, with $10 costs, on the authority of Matter of Ringgold v. New York City Tr. Auth. (286 App. Div. 806). Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.; Eager, J., concurs in the following memorandum: I concur under constraint to follow the holding in Matter of Ringgold v. New York City Tr. Auth. (286 App. Div. 806), which represents the law applicable to this application in the First Judicial Department.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on August 14, 1958, which granted the motion of the infant plaintiff for leave pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law to serve a late notice of claim unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion denied, with $10 costs, on the authority of Matter of Ringgold v. New York City Tr. Auth. (286 App. Div. 806). Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.; Eager, J., concurs in the following memorandum: I concur under constraint to follow the holding in Matter of Ringgold v. New York City Tr. Auth. (286 App. Div. 806), which represents the law applicable to this application in the First Judicial Department.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 468, 208 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quijano-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack