QUIJADA v. UNDERWOOD

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ENRIQUE QUIJADA, ) Petitioner, ) VS. Civil Action No. 3:23-cv-166 ) Judge Stephanie L. Haines MICHAEL UNDERWOOD, ) Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER On July 11, 2025, Magistrate Judge Kelly filed a Report and Recommendation (ECF No.

37) recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 9), filed by Enrique Quijada (“Petitioner”) be dismissed as moot. The Court found that Petitioner is no longer in the

custody of the Bureau of Prisons and the relief he sought in Earned Time Credits can no longer be

provided by the Court. Petitioner was advised he had fourteen days to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C.§ 636 (b)(1)(B) and (C) and Local Civil Rule 72.D.2.

Petitioner has not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so

has expired. Upon review of the record and the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 37) under the

applicable “reasoned consideration” standard, see EEOC v. City of Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 100

(3d Cir. 2017) (standard of review when no timely and specific objections are filed), and pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.D.2, the Court will accept in whole the findings and recommendations of

Magistrate Judge Kelly in this matter. Accordingly, the following order is entered:

ORDER AND NOW, this 31° day of July, 2025, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 9) hereby is DISMISSED as moot; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Kelly’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 37) is adopted as the Opinion of the Court. The Clerk of Court is to mark this case Closed. ~\ / fi 7 ~ Tatas ff pte “Stephanie L. Haines United States District Judge