Quigley v. State

753 So. 2d 764, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3415, 2000 WL 294762
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 22, 2000·No. No. 4D99-0653·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order dismissing appellant’s petition for writ of ha-beas corpus. We remand to the trial court for a hearing as to whether appellant retained counsel to timely file a 3.850 motion and whether counsel failed to timely file such a motion. See Medrano v. State, 748 So.2d 986 (Fla. 1999); Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So.2d 931 (Fla.1999).

GROSS, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quigley v. State, 753 So. 2d 764, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3415, 2000 WL 294762 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

753 So. 2d 764 (Quigley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quigley v. State
848 So. 2d 382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Krasnick v. State
780 So. 2d 1045 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)