Quigley v. State

753 So. 2d 764, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3415, 2000 WL 294762
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 22, 2000
DocketNo. 4D99-0653
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 753 So. 2d 764 (Quigley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quigley v. State, 753 So. 2d 764, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3415, 2000 WL 294762 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order dismissing appellant’s petition for writ of ha-beas corpus. We remand to the trial court for a hearing as to whether appellant retained counsel to timely file a 3.850 motion and whether counsel failed to timely file such a motion. See Medrano v. State, 748 So.2d 986 (Fla. 1999); Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So.2d 931 (Fla.1999).

GROSS, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quigley v. State
848 So. 2d 382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Krasnick v. State
780 So. 2d 1045 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
753 So. 2d 764, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3415, 2000 WL 294762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quigley-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.