Quigley v. Quigley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Quigley v. Quigley

871 S.W.2d 137, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 320, 1994 WL 57685

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 1, 1994·No. No. 63850·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding child custody to Wife. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are supported by the evidence and are not manifestly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding child custody to Wife. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are supported by the evidence and are not manifestly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Quigley v. Quigley, 871 S.W.2d 137, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 320, 1994 WL 57685 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

871 S.W.2d 137 (Quigley v. Quigley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.