Quigley v. Gorham

5 Cal. 418
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 5 Cal. 418 (Quigley v. Gorham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quigley v. Gorham, 5 Cal. 418 (Cal. 1855).

Opinion

Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Murray, C. J., concurred.

The words of a statute must be interpreted according to their common acceptation. In the Act which exempts certain articles from execution, the term “ wagon” is intended to mean a common vehicle for the transportation of goods, wares, and merchandize of all descriptions. A hackney coach used for the conveyance of passengers is a different article, and does not come within the equity or literal meaning of the Act.

Judgment reversed, and canse remanded;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Gundelfinger
262 P. 465 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
In Re Herman
191 P. 934 (California Supreme Court, 1920)
Perrin v. Miller
169 P. 426 (California Court of Appeal, 1917)
Edgecomb v. His Creditors
19 Nev. 149 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1885)
Cone v. Lewis
64 Tex. 331 (Texas Supreme Court, 1885)
Equitable Life Ins. v. Gleason
8 N.W. 790 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Cal. 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quigley-v-gorham-cal-1855.