Quigley, C. v. UCBR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 3, 2020·No. 92 EAL 2020 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

CAITLIN QUIGLEY, : No. 92 EAL 2020 :

Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : :

UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION : BOARD OF REVIEW, : :

Petitioner :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did Commonwealth Court violate the Unemployment Compensation Law and this

Court’s decision in Peak v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 501 A.2d 1383

(Pa. 1985) by misapplying Lyness v. State Bd. of Med., 605 A.2d 1204 (Pa. 1992)

to improperly limit the scope of the Board’s review solely to the issues raised by

the appellant?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quigley, C. v. UCBR, (Pa. 2020).

Quigley, C. v. UCBR (Quigley, C. v. UCBR) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lyness v. Com., State Bd. of Medicine
605 A.2d 1204 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Peak v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
501 A.2d 1383 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)