Quigley, C. v. UCBR
This text of Quigley, C. v. UCBR (Quigley, C. v. UCBR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
CAITLIN QUIGLEY, : No. 92 EAL 2020 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : : UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION : BOARD OF REVIEW, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did Commonwealth Court violate the Unemployment Compensation Law and this
Court’s decision in Peak v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 501 A.2d 1383
(Pa. 1985) by misapplying Lyness v. State Bd. of Med., 605 A.2d 1204 (Pa. 1992)
to improperly limit the scope of the Board’s review solely to the issues raised by
the appellant?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Quigley, C. v. UCBR, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quigley-c-v-ucbr-pa-2020.