Quigley, C. v. UCBR
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
CAITLIN QUIGLEY, : No. 92 EAL 2020 :
Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : :
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION : BOARD OF REVIEW, : :
Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did Commonwealth Court violate the Unemployment Compensation Law and this
Court’s decision in Peak v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 501 A.2d 1383
(Pa. 1985) by misapplying Lyness v. State Bd. of Med., 605 A.2d 1204 (Pa. 1992)
to improperly limit the scope of the Board’s review solely to the issues raised by
the appellant?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Quigley, C. v. UCBR (Quigley, C. v. UCBR) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.