Quiggle v. Quiggle

144 A.D.2d 1011, 534 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14564
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 144 A.D.2d 1011 (Quiggle v. Quiggle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quiggle v. Quiggle, 144 A.D.2d 1011, 534 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14564 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to respondent and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Onondaga County, for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: Family Court properly declined to modify the award for maintenance because of an insufficient showing of a change in circumstances. We agree also that Family Court had no jurisdiction to vacate the judgments entered in Supreme Court for arrears in maintenance. Upon referral, Family Court does have jurisdiction to modify orders of support granted by Supreme Court (NY Const, art VI, § 13 [c]). A judgment for arrears in support, however, is not subject to modification. If petitioner can show that he has paid the judgments, his proper remedy is to request satisfaction pieces from the judgment creditor and, if the judgment creditor refuses the request, to bring a motion under CPLR 5021 in the court in which the judgments were entered (see, CPLR 5021 [a] [2]).

Family Court, however, had no power to refer to Supreme Court the issue whether the judgments had been satisfied. We modify the order appealed from, therefore, by deleting the provision for referral to Supreme Court and we remit the matter to Supreme Court for a determination pursuant to CPLR 5021 (a) (2). (Appeal from order of Onondaga County [1012]*1012Family Court, McLaughlin, J. — modify divorce decree.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

230 Seaman Assoc. LLC v. Mullahey
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019
Malik v. Noe
54 A.D.3d 733 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Beal v. Beal
31 A.D.3d 472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
National Bank of New York City v. ESI Group, Inc.
201 A.D.2d 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 A.D.2d 1011, 534 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quiggle-v-quiggle-nyappdiv-1988.