Quigg v. State Ex Rel. Leggett

185 So. 842, 135 Fla. 842
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 20, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 185 So. 842 (Quigg v. State Ex Rel. Leggett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quigg v. State Ex Rel. Leggett, 185 So. 842, 135 Fla. 842 (Fla. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the above styled cause, Mr. Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Buford and Mr. Justice Chapman, are of the opinion that the judgment of the Circuit Court should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Wfiitfield., Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Thontas are of the *843 ■opinion that the said judgment should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme' Court, sitting six members 'in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in the opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton, v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

■ Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Miami v. Shell's Super Store
50 So. 2d 883 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 So. 842, 135 Fla. 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quigg-v-state-ex-rel-leggett-fla-1939.