Quicken Loans, Inc. v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Quicken Loans, Inc. v. Wilson

823 S.E.2d 697, 425 S.C. 574

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina

DecidedJanuary 9, 2019

DocketAppellate Case No. 2016-001214; Opinion No. 5613

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 823 S.E.2d 697 (Quicken Loans, Inc. v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quicken Loans, Inc. v. Wilson, 823 S.E.2d 697, 425 S.C. 574 (S.C. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

II. REMAINING ISSUES

Based on our finding Quicken did not violate the attorney preference statute, we decline to address its remaining arguments.

**582See Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc., 335 S.C. 598, 613, 518 S.E.2d 591, 598 (1999) (stating an appellate court need not address remaining issues when a decision on a prior issue is dispositive).

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, the order on appeal is

REVERSED.

HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

II. REMAINING ISSUES

Based on our finding Quicken did not violate the attorney preference statute, we decline to address its remaining arguments.

**582See Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc., 335 S.C. 598, 613, 518 S.E.2d 591, 598 (1999) (stating an appellate court need not address remaining issues when a decision on a prior issue is dispositive).

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, the order on appeal is

REVERSED.

HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

823 S.E.2d 697, 425 S.C. 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quicken-loans-inc-v-wilson-scctapp-2019.

Opinion

II. REMAINING ISSUES

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack