Quick v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Quick v. State

868 S.W.2d 488, 315 Ark. 540, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 212

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJanuary 18, 1994

DocketCR 93-1397

StatusPublished

This text of 868 S.W.2d 488 (Quick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quick v. State, 868 S.W.2d 488, 315 Ark. 540, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 212 (Ark. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appellant, Jimmy Don Quick, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Thurman Ragar, admits that the failure to file the record within the prescribed time was due to a mistake on his part.

We hold that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appellant, Jimmy Don Quick, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Thurman Ragar, admits that the failure to file the record within the prescribed time was due to a mistake on his part.

We hold that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

868 S.W.2d 488, 315 Ark. 540, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quick-v-state-ark-1994.