Quick v. State

868 S.W.2d 488, 315 Ark. 540, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 212
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 18, 1994·No. CR 93-1397·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appellant, Jimmy Don Quick, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Thurman Ragar, admits that the failure to file the record within the prescribed time was due to a mistake on his part.

We hold that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quick v. State, 868 S.W.2d 488, 315 Ark. 540, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 212 (Ark. 1994).

868 S.W.2d 488 (Quick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.