Quick v. State

825 So. 2d 263, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 473, 2001 WL 1658291
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 28, 2001
Docket1002062
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 825 So. 2d 263 (Quick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quick v. State, 825 So. 2d 263, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 473, 2001 WL 1658291 (Ala. 2001).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

MOORE, C.J., and HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, and WOODALL, JJ., concur. BROWN and STUART, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phillips v. State
65 So. 3d 971 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
825 So. 2d 263, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 473, 2001 WL 1658291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quick-v-state-ala-2001.