Quick v. Murphy Oil Co.

447 So. 2d 1074
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 2, 1984·No. 84-C-0386·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

447 So.2d 1074 (1984)

Arthur QUICK
v.
MURPHY OIL COMPANY, et al.

No. 84-C-0386.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 2, 1984.

Writ denied. The result, remanding the case to the district court for further proceedings, is correct. We decline, however, to express an opinion at this stage of the proceeding as to whether the date of "contraction" can be established with sufficient legal certainty to hold that the cause of action arises at that time. Such a determination *1075 necessarily requires expert testimony explaining how such time, or period of time, can be established. Until such a record is before the court, the issue cannot be fairly resolved. See Owens v. Martin, 438 So.2d 1114 (La.1984).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quick v. Murphy Oil Co., 447 So. 2d 1074 (La. 1984).

447 So. 2d 1074 (Quick v. Murphy Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hurst v. Boland Machine & Manufacturing Co.
713 So. 2d 857 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1998)