Quick v. Merrill
3 Cai. Cas. 133, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 476
Opinion
Notice of bail, necessarily imports a notice of retainer as attorney. As to the title of the notice, the ruling principle is, that if the party served be not misled, or the papers be not such as evidently may mislead, a mere clerical misprision shall not prejudice. It does not appear, that there was any other cause depending against Merrill. In liberal practice, the notice ought to have been received, and the objections must therefore be overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Quick v. Merrill, 3 Cai. Cas. 133, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 476 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).
3 Cai. Cas. 133 (Quick v. Merrill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Warren v. Eddy
13 Abb. Pr. 28 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)
Pignolet v. Daveau
2 Hilt. 584 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1860)
McGuin v. Cace
9 Abb. Pr. 160 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1859)
Cooley v. Lawrence
12 How. Pr. 176 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1855)