Home/New York Supreme Court/Quick v. Merrill

Quick v. Merrill

3 Cai. Cas. 133, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 476
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1805
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 133 (Quick v. Merrill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quick v. Merrill, 3 Cai. Cas. 133, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 476 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Opinion

Per curiam.

Notice of bail, necessarily imports a notice of retainer as attorney. As to the title of the notice, the ruling principle is, that if the party served be not misled, or the papers be not such as evidently may mislead, a mere clerical misprision shall not prejudice. It does not appear, that there was any other cause depending against Merrill. In liberal practice, the notice ought to have been received, and the objections must therefore be overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Warren v. Eddy
13 Abb. Pr. 28 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)
Pignolet v. Daveau
2 Hilt. 584 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1860)
McGuin v. Cace
9 Abb. Pr. 160 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1859)
Cooley v. Lawrence
12 How. Pr. 176 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1855)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cai. Cas. 133, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quick-v-merrill-nysupct-1805.