Quick v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

31 Mo. 399
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided January 15, 1861·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Napton, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This petition is deficient. It neither avers negligence nor misfeasance, nor states facts which would render such an averment unnecessary. It is stated that the road was not fenced according to law; but it is not stated that the injury was committed where there was no fence, and where there was no crossing, or one without suitable cattle-guards. The demurrer ought to have been sustained. (Burton v. North Mo. R. R., 30 Mo. p. 372.)

Judgment reversed and case remanded;

Judge Ewing concurs. Judge Scott absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quick v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad, 31 Mo. 399 (Mo. 1861).

31 Mo. 399 (Quick v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dyer v. Pacific Railroad
34 Mo. 127 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1863)