Quick v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

31 Mo. 399
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJanuary 15, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 Mo. 399 (Quick v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quick v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad, 31 Mo. 399 (Mo. 1861).

Opinion

Napton, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This petition is deficient. It neither avers negligence nor misfeasance, nor states facts which would render such an averment unnecessary. It is stated that the road was not fenced according to law; but it is not stated that the injury was committed where there was no fence, and where there was no crossing, or one without suitable cattle-guards. The demurrer ought to have been sustained. (Burton v. North Mo. R. R., 30 Mo. p. 372.)

Judgment reversed and case remanded;

Judge Ewing concurs. Judge Scott absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dyer v. Pacific Railroad
34 Mo. 127 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1863)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Mo. 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quick-v-hannibal-st-joseph-railroad-mo-1861.