Quibic

Court of Claims

Quibic

176 Ct. Cl. 1377, 1966 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 72, 1966 WL 1485

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedJune 6, 1966

DocketNo. 151-65

StatusPublished

This text of 176 Ct. Cl. 1377 (Quibic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quibic, 176 Ct. Cl. 1377, 1966 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 72, 1966 WL 1485 (cc 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Military pay; active duty pay; compensation for injuries; limitation of actions. — Plaintiff, who served during World War II in the Armed Forces of the Philippines, sues to recover compensation for such services and for injuries allegedly sustained prior to the termination of his active duty on September 26, 1945. Defendant has moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that it is barred by the six year statute [1378]*1378of limitations applicable to suits in this court, 28 U.S.C. § 2501, plaintiff’s service having been completed more than 20 years prior to the date of the filing of the petition in 1965. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion and plaintiff’s opposition and without oral argument, and on the basis of the decisions of the court in Rodriguez v. United States, 124 Ct. Cl. 551 (1953) ; Purino v. United States, 123 Ct. Cl. 739 (1952), and the order of March 14, 1966 in Marcial v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 1286, the court concluded that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations and on June 6, 1966 it was ordered that the petition be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Military pay; active duty pay; compensation for injuries; limitation of actions. — Plaintiff, who served during World War II in the Armed Forces of the Philippines, sues to recover compensation for such services and for injuries allegedly sustained prior to the termination of his active duty on September 26, 1945. Defendant has moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that it is barred by the six year statute [1378]*1378of limitations applicable to suits in this court, 28 U.S.C. § 2501, plaintiff’s service having been completed more than 20 years prior to the date of the filing of the petition in 1965. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion and plaintiff’s opposition and without oral argument, and on the basis of the decisions of the court in Rodriguez v. United States, 124 Ct. Cl. 551 (1953) ; Purino v. United States, 123 Ct. Cl. 739 (1952), and the order of March 14, 1966 in Marcial v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 1286, the court concluded that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations and on June 6, 1966 it was ordered that the petition be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 Ct. Cl. 1377, 1966 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 72, 1966 WL 1485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quibic-cc-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack