Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Quezada v. Topside Systems Inc.

Quezada v. Topside Systems Inc.

120 A.D.3d 1120, 992 N.Y.S.2d 413, 2014 NY Slip Op 06271, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6236
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 23, 2014
Docket12993 303247/13
StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.3d 1120 (Quezada v. Topside Systems Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quezada v. Topside Systems Inc., 120 A.D.3d 1120, 992 N.Y.S.2d 413, 2014 NY Slip Op 06271, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6236 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered December 16, 2013, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, without prejudice to renewal following discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

No discovery has been conducted, and the parties’ affidavits are inconsistent as to how the accident occurred (see generally Licurgo-Cruz v Ahmed, 118 AD3d 420 [1st Dept 2014]; CPLR 3212 [c], [f]).

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Richter and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Licurgo-Cruz v. Ahmed
118 A.D.3d 420 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 A.D.3d 1120, 992 N.Y.S.2d 413, 2014 NY Slip Op 06271, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quezada-v-topside-systems-inc-nyappdiv-2014.