Quezada v. State of California

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JOSE MIGUEL QUEZADA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00959-ADA-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO v. REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendants. (ECF No. 67) On November 9, 2023, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 67.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. Pursuant to the Court’s order on November 7, 2023, the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the settlement, for 180 days after the parties’ November 9, 2023 request for dismissal, or until the settlement amount is paid, whichever is shorter. /// /// /// /// /// Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule □□□□ IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee Dated: _ November 13, 2023 ;

‘ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE