Quevedo v. Fine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Quevedo v. Fine

302 A.D.2d 990, 755 N.Y.S.2d 357, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1091

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 302 A.D.2d 990 (Quevedo v. Fine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quevedo v. Fine, 302 A.D.2d 990, 755 N.Y.S.2d 357, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1091 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Stander, J.), entered February 4, 2002, which, inter alia, dismissed the second, third and fourth causes of action, denied plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment and directed plaintiffs to pay legal fees to defendants Michael Beyma, Esq., and Gordon Lipson, Esq., with respect to Beyma’s and Lipson’s preparation of a response to plaintiffs’ cross motion to disqualify and to remove the examiner.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court, Monroe County, Stander, J. Present — Wisner, J.P., Scudder, Burns and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Stander, J.), entered February 4, 2002, which, inter alia, dismissed the second, third and fourth causes of action, denied plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment and directed plaintiffs to pay legal fees to defendants Michael Beyma, Esq., and Gordon Lipson, Esq., with respect to Beyma’s and Lipson’s preparation of a response to plaintiffs’ cross motion to disqualify and to remove the examiner.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court, Monroe County, Stander, J. Present — Wisner, J.P., Scudder, Burns and Hayes, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 A.D.2d 990, 755 N.Y.S.2d 357, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quevedo-v-fine-nyappdiv-2003.