Quevedo ex rel. Quevedo v. Fonck

182 So. 2d 277
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 1966·No. No. 6395·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Travis v. Blackmon, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 698; Berne v. Peterson, Fla.App.1959, 113 So.2d 718; England v. Stauffer, Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 545; and Sullivan v. Stock, Fla.App.1957, 98 So.2d 507.

ALLEN, C. J., and LILES and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quevedo ex rel. Quevedo v. Fonck, 182 So. 2d 277 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

182 So. 2d 277 (Quevedo ex rel. Quevedo v. Fonck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sullivan v. Stock
98 So. 2d 507 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)
Berne v. Peterson
113 So. 2d 718 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
England v. Stauffer
145 So. 2d 545 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Travis v. Blackmon
155 So. 2d 698 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)