Question Submitted by: The Honorable James M. Boring, District Attorney, District One

2016 OK AG 3
CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedMay 18, 2016
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2016 OK AG 3 (Question Submitted by: The Honorable James M. Boring, District Attorney, District One) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Question Submitted by: The Honorable James M. Boring, District Attorney, District One, 2016 OK AG 3 (Okla. Super. Ct. 2016).

Opinion

Question Submitted by: The Honorable James M. Boring, District Attorney, District One
2016 OK AG 3
Decided: 05/18/2016
Oklahoma Attorney General Opinions


Cite as: 2016 OK AG 3, __ __

¶0 This office has received your request for an Official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following question:
Is an Oklahoma resident prohibited from carrying a handgun in Oklahoma if the only valid concealed or unconcealed carry weapons permit or license he or she holds is one issued by another state?

¶1 Under current state law, "the State of Oklahoma . . . recognizes any valid concealed or unconcealed carry weapons permit or license issued by another state." 21 O.S.Supp.2015, § 1290.26 (emphasis added).

¶2 You ask whether Oklahoma law prohibits an Oklahoma resident from carrying a handgun in Oklahoma if he or she holds a concealed or unconcealed carry weapons permit or license from another state, but not one from Oklahoma.

¶3 Based on the plain language of the Oklahoma Self-Defense Act ("the Act"), we conclude that the Act allows an Oklahoma resident to carry a handgun in Oklahoma so long as he or she is authorized to carry pursuant to a valid license issued by either Oklahoma or another state.

I.

Analysis

¶4 The question presented involves a straightforward matter of statutory interpretation. This inquiry begins with the text of the statute and--absent unresolvable ambiguity--ends with the text. This is so because the sole means by which a legislature makes law is to agree upon the final language that passes into law. Our task is thus to determine the ordinary meaning of the words that the Legislature chose in the provisions of law at issue. See Rogers v. Quiktrip Corp., 2010 OK 3, ¶11, 230 P.3d 853, 859 ("[I]ntent is first divined from the language of a statute.").

¶5 The Oklahoma Self-Defense Act provides a comprehensive regime governing the circumstances under which persons in Oklahoma may carry handguns. See 21 O.S.2011 & Supp.2015, §§ 1290.1-1290.27. The Act makes it "unlawful for any person to carry a concealed or unconcealed handgun in this state, except as hereby authorized . . . or as may otherwise be provided by law." Id. § 1290.4.

¶6 Generally speaking, the Act authorizes a person to carry a handgun in Oklahoma if they have (1) a license issued by the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation, id § 1290.3, (2) a license issued by another state, id.§ 1290.26, or (3) the right to lawfully carry in his or her state of residence without a license, id. § 1290.26(B).1

¶7 With respect to licenses issued by other states, the Act "recognizes any valid concealed or unconcealed carry weapons permit or license issued by another state." 21 O.S.Supp.2015, § 1290.26 (emphasis added). The Act does not define "valid" or otherwise qualify this sweeping recognition of licenses issued by other states. The plain language meaning of "valid" when used in this context is "having legal strength or force." Webster's Third New Int'l Dictionary 2529 (3d ed. 1993). Thus, according to the plain terms of the statute, Oklahoma recognizes any license that has legal force in its state of issue. This reflects a permissive approach to recognition of licenses from other states, whereby Oklahoma does not look behind the license to determine whether the licensing requirements were commensurate with the Act's requirements for issuance through the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation. Additionally, this broad recognition indicates that Oklahoma does not maintain a true reciprocity agreement with other states because Oklahoma's recognition of a license issued by another state is not conditioned on that state likewise recognizing licenses issued by Oklahoma.

¶8 This was not always the case. As originally enacted in 1996, the Act limited Oklahoma's recognition of licenses from other states to only those licenses issued pursuant to licensing regimes similar to Oklahoma's, namely:

any valid concealed carry weapons permit or license issued by another state, provided the issuing state: (1) Requires a state and national criminal history records search to be conducted on each applicant; (2) Prohibits any person convicted of a felony offense from obtaining a concealed carry weapons permit or license; (3) Requires competence qualification, or training with the firearm to be carried by the person; and (4) Does not authorize any weapon to be carried which would be a violation of Oklahoma law.

1996 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 191, § 20 (emphasis added). In 1998, the Legislature added another limitation to this section, making it a condition to recognition that the issuing state offered reciprocal recognition of Oklahoma licenses. 1998 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 286, § 7. In other words, the prior version of Section 1290.26 was a true reciprocity agreement, and one that contained significant limitations that ensured Oklahoma would recognize only certain types of licenses, i.e., those issued with safeguards similar to those imposed by Oklahoma.

¶9 In 2003, the Legislature eliminated those limitations, so that Section 1290.26 read:

The State of Oklahoma hereby recognizes any valid concealed carry weapons permit or license issued by another state.

Any person entering this state in possession of a firearm authorized for concealed carry upon the authority and license of another state is authorized to continue to carry a concealed firearm and license in this state; provided the license from the other state remains valid. The firearm must be carried fully concealed from detection and view, and upon coming in contact with any peace officer of this state, the person must disclose the fact that he or she is in possession of a concealed firearm pursuant to a valid concealed carry weapons permit or license issued in another state. Any person who is twenty-one (21) years of age or older having a valid firearm license from another state may apply for a concealed handgun license in this state immediately upon establishing a residence in this state.

2003 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 465, § 9. In 2012, the Legislature liberalized Section 1290.26 even further, adding a new subsection B that allowed carry in Oklahoma even by those with no license at all, so long as they were residents of a state that allowed carry without a license. 2012 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 195, § 1. And finally, in 2013, the legislature amended Section 1290.26 to its current form, expanding coverage to persons authorized for concealed and "unconcealed" carry alike. 2013 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 15, § 18.

¶10 The Legislature's elimination of the qualifiers that were previously placed on Oklahoma's recognition of licenses issued by other states confirms that "any valid concealed or unconcealed carry weapons permit or license issued by another state,"

21 O.S.Supp.2015, § 1290.26, means exactly what it says. Any license that is valid in the eyes of the issuing state is valid in Oklahoma, regardless of whether the conditions for issuance are commensurate with those imposed by the Act.

II.

Discussion

¶11 You essentially ask whether Section 1290.26 limits the recognition of licenses issued by other states such that it in effect reads: "[t]he State of Oklahoma hereby recognizes any valid concealed or unconcealed carry weapons permit or license issued by another state, provided that it is held by a resident of another state

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing Home
2005 OK 27 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2005)
Rogers v. QuikTrip Corp.
2010 OK 3 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2010)
Cox v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Human Services
2004 OK 17 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2004)
State v. District Court of Cleveland County
1991 OK CR 68 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 OK AG 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/question-submitted-by-the-honorable-james-m-boring-district-attorney-oklaag-2016.