Question Submitted by: The Honorable A.J. Griffin, Oklahoma State Senator, District 20

2017 OK AG 10
CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedSeptember 7, 2017
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2017 OK AG 10 (Question Submitted by: The Honorable A.J. Griffin, Oklahoma State Senator, District 20) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Question Submitted by: The Honorable A.J. Griffin, Oklahoma State Senator, District 20, 2017 OK AG 10 (Okla. Super. Ct. 2017).

Opinion

Question Submitted by: The Honorable A.J. Griffin, Oklahoma State Senator, District 20
2017 OK AG 10
Decided: 09/07/2017
Oklahoma Attorney General Opinions


Cite as: 2017 OK AG 10, __ __

¶0 This office has received your request for an Official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following questions:
1. Does the exception to Section 797 of the Gift Certificate and Gift Card Disclosure Act, 15 O.S.2011, §§ 795-799, for "gift certificates or gift cards that are issued for a food product" apply to gift cards or certificates issued by a restaurant that are redeemable for food or beverages up to a specified dollar amount, but which do not identify specific food or beverage items?
2. If the answer to Question #1 is yes, may the gift certificate or gift card in question be limited to seasonal offerings (
e.g., redeemable only during the Thanksgiving holiday)?
3. May a restaurant include a disclaimer on its gift cards or certificates that they will not be replaced or refunded if lost or stolen?

I.

Background

¶1 Enacted in 20051 and codified in Title 15, Sections 795-799 of the Oklahoma Statutes, the Oklahoma Gift Certificate and Gift Card Disclosure Act (the "Act"), among other things, limits the use of expiration dates and imposition of service fees on gift cards and gift certificates.2 For instance, the Act makes it unlawful for a gift certificate to expire less than 60 months from the date of purchase, and gift certificates that do not specify an expiration date are valid until redeemed or replaced. 15 O.S.2011, § 797(A), (B). Similarly, service fees are permitted only in limited circumstances and amounts, and details of any fee must be printed conspicuously on the gift certificate. Id. § 797(D).

¶2 The Act also includes exceptions for certain types of gift certificates. Relevant to your questions, the restrictions set forth in Section 797 of the Act do not apply to gift certificates "that are issued for a food product," so long as "the expiration date appears in capital letters in at least ten-point font on the front of" the gift certificate. 15 O.S.2011, § 797(C).

II.

Discussion

¶3 Your first question is whether a restaurant gift certificate that is redeemable for food or beverages up to a specified dollar amount, but which does not identify specific food or beverage items, is "issued for a food product." This question raises two distinct issues: first, whether use of the singular term "a food product" means the gift certificate must identify one specific food product; and second, whether the term "food product" includes food and beverage items offered at a restaurant. We are then presented with a third issue of whether a gift certificate subject to the "food product" exception may feature an expiration date that coincides with a seasonal offering. Finally, we must determine whether the Act limits an issuer's discretion in handling lost or stolen gift certificates.

¶4 When analyzing each issue, we look to the plain meaning of the language used in the Act. See 25 O.S.2011, § 1. Indeed, statutes must be interpreted according to their text and when the text is clear, no further inquiry into legislative intent is permitted unless a particular application will lead to absurd results. See Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund, 2001 OK 71, ¶ 13, 33 P.3d 302, 307. See also Twin Hills Golf & Country Club, Inc. v. Town of Forest Park, 2005 OK 71, ¶ 6, 123 P.3d 5, 6-7 ("Where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, legislative intent and the meaning of the statute will be gleaned from the face of the statute without resort to judicial rules of statutory construction."). With that foundation in mind, we explore each of the four issues in turn.

A. A gift certificate "issued for a food product" encompasses gift certificates redeemable for food or beverages up to a specific dollar amount from a single vendor.

¶5 We first look at whether a gift certificate "issued for a food product" includes only those certificates that identify a singular, specific food product, or, alternatively, whether that term may encompass certificates redeemable for a broader offering of food products available from a single vendor. The Legislature's use of the singular is not dispositive on this issue. Rather, in construing Oklahoma statutes "words used in the singular number include the plural, and the plural the singular, except where a contrary intention plainly appears." 25 O.S.2011, § 25.

¶6 In reviewing the Act, we have not located anything to suggest that construing the term "a food product" as having both singular and plural meaning is somehow plainly contrary to the intent of the Act. Accordingly, the general rule applies, with the result being that a gift certificate need not specify a particular food product, but can encompass multiple food products available from a single vendor.

B. The term "food product" includes prepared food or beverages offered at a restaurant.

¶7 To determine whether the term "food product" includes food and beverage items offered at a restaurant, we look to the ordinary meaning of the term. As noted above, "[w]ords used in any statute are to be understood in their ordinary sense, except when a contrary intention plainly appears[.]" 25 O.S.2011, § 1. Although the Act does not provide a definition, the ordinary meaning of "food" is "material consisting of carbohydrates, fats, proteins, and supplementary substances (as minerals, vitamins) that is taken or absorbed into the body." Webster's Third New International Dictionary 884 (3d ed. 1993). "Product" means, among other things, "something produced," while "produce" is "something that is brought forth or yielded either naturally or as a result of effort and work." Id. at 1810. Food and beverage items offered at a restaurant comport with the combination of those definitions-food, or material, that is produced by or the result of effort and work. Cf. A.G. Opin. 2000-36, at 161 (finding the common meaning of "food product" as used in a different statute to be "food produced by nature or made by human industry or art").

¶8 Further, the use of the term "food product" in other statutes related to food or meals supports a reading of "food product" that would include food and beverage items offered at a restaurant. For example, "food product" is used to describe prepared meals delivered to elderly or homebound persons. See 68 O.S.Supp.2016, § 1357(13). Accordingly, we conclude that a gift certificate "issued for a food product" includes a restaurant gift certificate that is redeemable for food or beverages up to a specified dollar amount, but which does not identify a specific food or beverage item.

C. A gift certificate meeting one of the exceptions under Section 797(C) is not subject to the Act's general limitations on expiration dates, so long as its expiration date is disclosed in the manner required by the Act.

¶9 Next, we consider whether the type of gift certificate described above may contain an expiration date associated with a seasonal event or marked by an otherwise shortened time-frame. Because such gift certificates are "issued for a food product[,]" they are excepted from the Act's general limitations on expiration dates. See 15 O.S.2011, § 797(C).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund
2001 OK 71 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2001)
Twin Hills Golf & Country Club, Inc. v. Town of Forest Park
2005 OK 71 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2005)
Cox v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Human Services
2004 OK 17 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 OK AG 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/question-submitted-by-the-honorable-aj-griffin-oklahoma-state-senator-oklaag-2017.