Question Submitted by: General Myles Deering, Executive Director, Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs

2017 OK AG 8
CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedAugust 28, 2017
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2017 OK AG 8 (Question Submitted by: General Myles Deering, Executive Director, Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Question Submitted by: General Myles Deering, Executive Director, Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs, 2017 OK AG 8 (Okla. Super. Ct. 2017).

Opinion

Question Submitted by: General Myles Deering, Executive Director, Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs
2017 OK AG 8
Decided: 08/28/2017
Oklahoma Attorney General Opinions


Cite as: 2017 OK AG 8, __ __

¶0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following question:
¶1 Whether proceeds from the sale of real property under the jurisdiction of the Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs must be deposited in (1) the Maintenance of State Buildings Revolving Fund established by 62 O.S.Supp.2016, § 908(H), or, alternatively, (2) the Capital Improvement Revolving Fund created pursuant to 72 O.S.Supp.2016, § 63.19(D)?

I.

Background

¶2 The Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs ("ODVA") is a cabinet-level department administered by the Oklahoma Veterans Commission through rules, regulations, and policies promulgated by the Commission. 72 O.S.Supp.2016, § 63.1; see also id § 63.3. ODVA has broad authority over providing care and assistance to military veterans, including making and entering into contracts to finance hospitals, healthcare facilities, and Oklahoma Veterans Centers. See id. §§ 63.1, 63.12, 63.13, 202. ODVA is also authorized to acquire and manage real property in certain circumstances, see id. § 63.19, but the statute does not provide specific procedures for the sale or other disposition of such property. Accordingly, ODVA must follow the procedure set forth in Title 61, Section 327 in order to sell a parcel of real property. See A.G. Opin. 1984-86, at 155 ("Where a Department/Commission has no specific procedures for the disposition of real property, we look to the procedures set forth in [Section 327]").

II.

Discussion

¶3 Title 61, Section 327 of the Oklahoma Statutes sets forth the general procedures governing State-owned real property transactions. 61 O.S.Supp.2016, § 327. A sale of such property is triggered by an agency's request to the Office of Management and Enterprise Services ("OMES") to sell a parcel of real property as authorized by: (1) specific legislation, (2) the Long-Range Capital Planning Commission, or (3) a determination that the property is "no longer needed." Id. § 327(B)(1). While the Legislature has provided for these three avenues to sell State-owned real property, the Long-Range Capital Planning Commission ("Commission") is charged with the ultimate authority to approve all transfers of State-owned real property. 74 O.S.Supp.2016, § 61.8(F). The only State entities exempt from this approval requirement are the Oklahoma Ordnance Works Authority ("OOWA"), the Commissioners of the Land Office ("CLO"), the Oklahoma Department of Transportation ("ODOT"), and the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority ("OTA"). Id. § 61.8(H).

A. The Long-Range Capital Planning Commission's role in transfers of State-owned real property.

¶4 The Long-Range Capital Planning Commission was created in 1992 as a part of the State Capital Improvement Planning Act, codified in Title 62, Sections 900 and 901. See 1992 Okla. Sess. Laws c. 330, §§ 1, 2. Under the State Capital Improvement Planning Act, the Commission "advise[s] and assist[s] the Legislature in providing for real property capital facility needs for this state." 62 O.S.Supp.2016, § 901(A). This advice and assistance is provided primarily through the preparation of an annual capital budget plan and a State capital plan that addresses "the state capital facility needs for the next ensuing eight (8) years." Id. § 901(F)(1). For some twenty (20) years, the focus of the Commission was on planning for the immediate and future building needs of the State's capital facilities.1

¶5 In 2013, the Legislature expanded the Commission's role by enacting what is now codified at Title 74, Section 61.8. See 2013 Okla. Sess. Laws c. 209, § 2. Section 61.8 requires the Commission to "work to decrease the amount of property owned by Oklahoma state government, return state-owned property to private sector ownership, better maintain and utilize the state's needed capital assets and, whenever possible, eliminate the practice of state agencies leasing real property not owned by the state."

74 O.S.Supp.2016, § 61.8(A). Thus, the Commission's purpose grew beyond that of planning for the State's immediate and future capital property needs to centrally managing State-owned property.

¶6 Also in 2013, the Legislature amended Title 61, Section 327-the general procedures for transferring State-owned real property-to permit an agency to seek authorization from the Commission to sell real property.

2 2013 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 209, § 7 (codified at 61 O.S.Supp.2016, § 327(B)(1)(b)).

¶7 In 2014, the Legislature amended Title 74, Section 61.8 by adding subsection F, further broadening the Commission's powers:

No state agency, board, commission or public trust having the state as its beneficiary shall transfer any real property owned by the agency, board, commission or trust to any other state agency, board, commission, state beneficiary trust or any public or private entity unless the transfer is first approved by the Long-Range Capital Planning Commission . . . The Commission shall not approve any transfer unless proceeds from the sale shall be deposited in the Maintenance of State Buildings Revolving Fund as established by Section 908 of Title 62 of the Oklahoma Statutes.
3

2014 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 286, § 1 (codified at

74 O.S.Supp.2016, § 61.8(F)).

¶8 Under the plain and broad language of Section 61.8(F), the Commission must approve or ratify an agency's decision to sell real property, regardless of the underlying authority for the sale. The Commission's approval authority extends to all but four State entities-OOWA, CLO, ODOT, and OTA.

74 O.S.Supp.2016, § 61.8(H). Thus, unless an agency is specifically exempted from Section 61.8, or the statute authorizing the agency to dispose of its property has a phrase such as "notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary," obtaining Commission approval is a prerequisite for any sale of State-owned real property. This conclusion is consistent with the Commission's role in overseeing the State's real property assets. See id. § 61.8(A) ("The Long-Range Capital Planning Commission shall work to decrease the amount of property owned by Oklahoma state government, return state-owned real property to private sector ownership, better maintain and utilize the state's needed capital assets, and whenever possible, eliminate the practice of state agencies leasing real property not owned by the state."); 62 O.S.Supp.2016, § 901(A) (creating the Commission to "advise and assist the Legislature in providing for real property capital facility needs for this state").

¶9 At first glance, this requirement to obtain Commission approval might appear to conflict with statutes that grant State agencies like ODVA the authority to transfer real property. See

72 O.S.Supp.2016, § 63.20. However, "when parts of an act are reasonably susceptible of a construction which will give effect to both and to the words of each, without violence to either, such construction should be adopted in preference to one which, though reasonable, leads to the conclusion that there is a conflict." Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 89 v.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boice v. State
1970 OK 148 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1970)
City of Sand Springs v. Department of Public Welfare
608 P.2d 1139 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1980)
Roach v. Atlas Life Insurance Co.
1989 OK 27 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 OK AG 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/question-submitted-by-general-myles-deering-executive-director-oklahoma-oklaag-2017.