Question Submitted by: Chair Troy Wilson, Commissioner Denise Engle, Commissioner Robert Gilliland, The Workers Compensation Commission

2014 OK AG 16
CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedNovember 18, 2014
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2014 OK AG 16 (Question Submitted by: Chair Troy Wilson, Commissioner Denise Engle, Commissioner Robert Gilliland, The Workers Compensation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Question Submitted by: Chair Troy Wilson, Commissioner Denise Engle, Commissioner Robert Gilliland, The Workers Compensation Commission, 2014 OK AG 16 (Okla. Super. Ct. 2014).

Opinion

OSCN Found Document:Question Submitted by: Chair Troy Wilson, Commissioner Denise Engle, Commissioner Robert Gilliland, The Workers Compensation Commission
  1. Home
  2. Courts
  3. Court Dockets
  4. Legal Research
  5. Calendar
  6. Help
  1. Previous Case
  2. Top Of Index
  3. This Point in Index
  4. Citationize
  5. Next Case
  6. Print Only

Question Submitted by: Chair Troy Wilson, Commissioner Denise Engle, Commissioner Robert Gilliland, The Workers Compensation Commission
2014 OK AG 16
Decided: 11/18/2014
Oklahoma Attorney General Opinions


Cite as: 2014 OK AG 16, __ __

¶0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following questions:
1. Is the purpose of the tax levied in

85A O.S.Supp.2013, § 122(B) solely to provide funds for the Workers' Compensation Fund?
2. If so, did the Legislature violate Article X, Section 19 of the Oklahoma Constitution by appropriating proceeds of that tax in a manner inconsistent with that purpose?

I.

Introduction

¶1 In your request, you state that 85A O.S.Supp.2013, § 122(A) levied certain tax assessments to provide funds for the Workers' Compensation Fund--a fund created in 85A O.S.Supp.2013, § 28. Further, you state that use of these proceeds for any "other purpose" must be consistent with this primary purpose--providing funds for the Fund. You believe that use of these tax proceeds for general revenue purposes--and not for the use or benefit or at the direction of the Workers' Compensation Commission--violates Article X, Section 19 of the Oklahoma Constitution.1

¶2 On May 1, 2013, the Legislature approved Senate Bill ("SB") 1062--a bill designed to transition the old, adversarial workers' compensation court system into an administrative system for resolving workers' compensation claims. On May 6, 2013, Governor Mary Fallin signed SB 1062 into law and it is now codified as Title 85A. See 2013 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 208.

¶3 Title 85A is comprised of three inter-related acts: the Administrative Workers' Compensation Act ("Act"), the Oklahoma Employee Injury Benefit Act, and the Workers' Compensation Arbitration Act.

85A O.S.Supp.2013, §§ 1, 200, 300. Section 19 of Title 85A places with the Workers' Compensation Commission ("Commission") the exclusive responsibility and duty of carrying out the provisions of the first act: the Administrative Workers' Compensation Act. Id. § 19(A).

¶4 Your questions relate to two sections of the Administrative Worker's Compensation Act: Section 122 and Section 28, which is cross-referenced in Section 122. Section 122 of Title 85A states, in relevant part:

A. The Workers' Compensation Fund established by Section 28 of this act shall be used for the costs of administering this act and for other purposes pursuant to legislative appropriation.

B. For the purpose of providing funds for the Workers' Compensation Fund, each mutual or interinsurance association, stock company, CompSource Oklahoma or other insurance carrier writing workers' compensation insurance in this state shall pay to the Oklahoma Tax Commission an assessment at a rate of one percent (1%) of all gross direct premiums written during each quarter of the calendar year for workers' compensation insurance on risks located in this state after deducting [certain expenses]. . . .

C. When an employer is authorized to become a self-insurer, the Commission shall so notify the Tax Commission, giving the effective date of such authorization. The Tax Commission shall then assess and collect from the employers carrying their own risk an assessment at the rate of two percent (2%) of the total compensation for permanent total disability awards, permanent partial disability awards and death benefits paid out during each quarter of the calendar year by the employers. Such assessment shall be payable by the employers and collected by the Tax Commission . . . .

D. It shall be the duty of the Tax Commission to collect the payments provided for in this act. . . .

E. The Tax Commission shall pay monthly to the State Treasurer to the credit of the General Revenue Fund all monies collected under the provisions of this section.

Id.

¶5 Section 28, in turn, establishes the Workers' Compensation Fund ("Fund") within the Office of the State Treasurer, id. § 28(A)(1). Section 28 states in relevant part:

B. Except as provided [for an unrelated fund], no money shall be appropriated from these funds for any purpose except for the use and benefit, or at the direction, of the Oklahoma Workers' Compensation Commission.

C. Except as provided [for an unrelated fund], all funds established under this section shall be administered, disbursed, and invested under the direction of the Commission and the State Treasurer.

. . . .

H. The Workers' Compensation Fund shall be used to fund the activities of the Commission in administering the Administrative Workers' Compensation Act and for any other purposes related to the Administrative Workers' Compensation Act that the Commission deems appropriate, subject to the provisions of Section 122 of this title.

I. Unless provided otherwise in the Administrative Workers' Compensation Act, all fines and penalties assessed under the . . . Act shall be deposited into the Workers' Compensation Fund.

Id. § 28. Because these sections cross-reference each other, they must be read together.

II.

Standards

¶6 Article X, Section 19 of the Oklahoma Constitution states that "[e]very act enacted by the Legislature . . . levying a tax shall specify distinctly the purpose for which said tax is levied, and no tax levied and collected for one purpose shall ever be devoted to another purpose." Okla. Const. art. X, § 19. "[S]ection 19 contains two distinct commands (1) that every act . . . levying a tax specify distinctly the purpose for which the tax is levied, and (2) that the tax when so levied and collected for one purpose shall never be devoted to another purpose." State ex. rel. Bd. of Comm'rs v. Okla. Tax Comm'n,

127 P.2d 1052, 1054 (Okla. 1942).

¶7 When called upon to interpret statutes, we apply rules of statutory interpretation. Those rules provide that, in the case of clear, unambiguous statutes, we must presume "that the Legislature expressed its intent and intended what it expressed." Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co.,

184 P.3d 518, 525 (Okla. 2008). "When possible, different provisions must be construed together to effect an harmonious whole." Villines v. Szczepanski, 122 P.3d 466, 471 (Okla. 2005). That is, the goal "is always to construe apparently conflicting legislative enactments dealing with the same subject together as a harmonious whole so as to give effect to each provision." McNeill v.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Application of St. of Oklahoma Bldg. Bonds Commission
1950 OK 45 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1950)
Sublett v. City of Tulsa
405 P.2d 185 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1965)
McNeill v. City of Tulsa
1998 OK 2 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1998)
Estate of Villines v. Szczepanski
2005 OK 63 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2005)
Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co.
2008 OK 21 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2008)
State Ex Rel. Board of Com'rs v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
1942 OK 266 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1942)
Ward v. State
1936 OK 293 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)
State ex rel. Howard v. Crawford
2000 OK CIV APP 142 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 OK AG 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/question-submitted-by-chair-troy-wilson-commissioner-denise-engle-oklaag-2014.