Questelle v. Hamp
This text of 293 N.E.2d 137 (Questelle v. Hamp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court:
This is an appeal by the defendant from a money judgment for the plaintiff entered after a bench trial in a small claims case. Defendant’s truck left the highway, traveled a considerable distance, and then struck • and damaged plaintiffs building.
Defendant has here questioned the qualifications of plaintiffs witnesses who testified as to damages. The evidence as to damages was admitted without objection at the trial. It is now too late to raise such an objection for the first time.
We find that no error of law appears, that an opinion would have no precedential value, and that the decision is not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
We therefore affirm in accordance with 50 Ill.2d R. 23.
Affirm.
EBERSPACHER, P. J., and JONES, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
293 N.E.2d 137, 9 Ill. App. 3d 802, 1973 Ill. App. LEXIS 2847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/questelle-v-hamp-illappct-1973.